Introduction to Evidence
Wrightsman, L., et al. (2002). Psychology
and the Legal System (5e), Chapter
Federal Rules of Evidence (as
amended through December 1, 2000).
Hans, V., & Vidmar, N. (1982).
Jury selection. In N. Kerr & R.
Bray (Eds.), The psychology of
the courtroom. NY: Academic Press.
Schulman, J., et al. (1973). Recipe
for a jury. Psychology Today,
Batson v. Kentucky (1986), 54 U.S.L.W.
Qualifying Juries for the Death
Governor George Ryan (January 11,
2003). Speech at Northwestern University
College of Law.
Lockhart v. McCree (1986), 476 U.S.
Bersoff, D., & Ogden, D. (1987).
In the Supreme Court of the United
States: Lockhart v. McCree. American
Psychologist, 42, 59 68.
Radelet, M., & Borg, M. (2000).
The changing nature of death penalty
debates. Annual Review of Sociology,
Stasser, G., et al. (1982). The
social psychology of jury deliberations.
In N. Kerr & R. Bray (Eds.), The
psychology of the courtroom (pp.
221-256). NY: Academic Press.
Horowitz, J., & Willging, T. (1991). Changing views of jury power: The
nullification debate, 1787 1988. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 165 182.
Penrod, S. & Heuer, L. (1997).
Tweaking commonsense: Assessing aids
to jury decision making. Psychology,
Public Policy & Law, 3, 259-284.
Police Interrogations and Confessions
Miranda v. Arizona, 284 U.S. 436
Leo, R. (1996). Inside the interrogation
room. Journal of Law and Criminology,
Kassin, S. (1997). The psychology
of confession evidence. American
Psychologist, 52, 221-233.
Ofshe, R. (1992). Inadvertent hypnosis
in police interrogation: False confession
due to dissociative state, misidentified
MPD and the satanic cult hypothesis. International
Journal of Clinical and Experimental
Hypnosis, 40, 125-156.
Kassin, S. (November 1, 2002). False
confessions and the jogger case. New
York Times, p. A31.
New York v. Wise et al. (December
5, 2002), Affirmation in Response
to Motion to Vacate Judgment of Conviction,
Indictment No. 4762/89.
Massachusetts v. DiGiambattista
(2004). Slip Opinion SJC-09155, August
Ekman, P. & O'Sullivan, M. (1991).
Who can catch a liar? American Psychologist,
Raskin, D., & Honts, C. (2002).
The comparison question test. In
M. Kleiner (Ed.), Handbook of
polygraph testing. London: Academic.
Faigman, D.L., et al. (2002). Polygraph
tests. In Science in the law:
Forensic issues (pp. 555-663).
St. Paul: West.
American Polygraph Association, http://www.polygraph.org.
Doyle, J. (2005). True Witness:
Cops, Courts, Science, and the
Struggle Against Misidentification. NY:
PBS Frontline (2000). What Jennifer
Buckhout, R. (1974). Eyewitness
testimony. Scientific American,
231, 23 31.
Wells, G. (1993). What do we know
about eyewitness identification?
testimony. American Psychologist,
U.S. Department of Justice (1999).
Eyewitness Evidence: A Guide for
Law Enforcement. http://www.ncjrs.org/pdffiles1/nij/178240.pdf
Wells, G., et al. (2000). From the
lab to police station: A successful
application of eyewitness research. American
Psychologist, 55, 581-598.
Repressed & Recovered "Memories"
Loftus, E. (1993). The reality of
repressed memories. American Psychologist,
Loftus, E. (2004). Memories of things
unseen. Current Directions in
Psychological Science, 13, 145-147.
Alpert, J., Brown, L., & Courtois,
C. (1998). Symptomatic clients and
memories of childhood abuse: What
the trauma and child sexual abuse
literature tells us. Psychology,
Public Policy, & Law, 4,
Corwin,D., & Olafson, E. (1997).
Videotaped discovery of a reportedly
unrecallable memory of child sexual
abuse: Comparison with a childhood
interview videotaped 11 years before. Child
Maltreatment, 2, 91-112.
Loftus, E., & Guyer, M. (2002).
Who abused Jane Doe? The hazards
of the single case history. Skeptical
Inquirer, May/ June 2002.
Children as Witnesses in Sex
Rosenthal, R. (1995). State of New
Jersey v. Margaret Kelly Michaels:
An overview. Psychology, Public
Policy, & Law, 2, 246-271.
Bruck, M., & Ceci, S. (1995).
Amicus brief for the case of New
Jersey v. Michaels presented by committee
of concerned social scientists. Psychology,
Public Policy, & Law, 1,
Ceci, S., & Bruck, M. (2000).
Why judges must insist on electronically
preserved recordings of child interviews. Court
Reiser, M. (1974). Hypnosis as an
aid in a homicide investigation. American
Journal of Clinical Hypnosis,
17, 84 87.
Sheehan, P., et al. (1991). Pseudomemory
effects and their relation to susceptibility
to hypnosis and state instruction. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology,
Rock v. Arkansas (1987). 483 U.S.
Newman, A., & Thompson, J. (2001).
The rise and fall of forensic hypnosis
in criminal investigation. Journal
of the American Academy of Psychiatry & the
Law, 29, 75-84.
The Criminal Mind as Evil…or "Insane"
PBS Frontline (1984). The Mind
of a Murderer, Part II. The Case
of the Hillside Strangler.
Low, P., et al. (2000). The Trial
of John Hinckley: A case study
in the insanity defense (2e).
Mineola, NY: Foundation Press.
APA Online (1996). The insanity
defense. Washington, DC: American
Ogloff, J. P. (1991). A comparison
of insanity defense standards on
juror decision making. Law and
Human Behavior, 15, 509-532.
Psychologists as Experts, Consultants,
Friends, & Whores of the Court
Monahan, J., & Walker, L. (1988).
Social science research in law: A
new paradigm. American Psychologist,
43, 465 472.
Faigman, D.L. (1995). The evidentiary
status of social science under Daubert:
Is it "scientific," "technical," or "other" knowledge? Psychology,
Public Policy, & Law, 1,
Hagen, M. (1997). Whores of the
court: The fraud of psychiatric
testimony and the rape of American
justice. New York: HarperCollins.
(pp. 1-14, 100-133).
Roesch, R., Golding, S. L., Hans,
V. P., & Reppucci, N. D. (1991).
Social science and the courts: The
role of amicus curiae briefs. Law
and Human Behavior, 15, 1-11.
Slobogin, C. (1999). The admissibility
of behavioral science information
in criminal trials: From primitivism
to Daubert to Voice. Psychology,
Public Policy, & Law, 5,
Strier, F. (1999). Whither trial
consulting? Law and Human Behavior,