![]()
“To try a new format at this stage of one’s career said English Professor Peter Murphy, who relished his first opportunity to teach a tutorial last fall after 23 years in the classroom. Murphy used the opportunity to try an experiment in looking at his main academic intersect — 18th and 19th century literature. His course, Romantic Experiments (English 331T), is structured much differently than a usual lecture survey or seminar. Each week, the students read a work of poetry from between 1780 and 1830 that featured a poet trying to think of new ways of making his or her point.
Each of the works on the syllabus, Murphy said, is “gripping,” “baffling,” and a little strange. They include William Wordsworth’s “Lucy” poems, Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner” and “Kubla Khan,” and poems by William Blake. The format for the course was similar to most other tutorials. In his case, he had ten students — none of which, incidentally, had taken a tutorial before. He paired them off, and they would meet for an hour in his office once a week. For each session, one student would prepare a five to six page paper, and his or her partner would prepare a rebuttal. Murphy said having the students read the papers aloud was an important part of the process.
he said. “The way it dramatizes argument is wonderful. The format itself is pedagogically very powerful.” Susannah Emerson ’12 was inspired to take the course based on a previous experience in Murphy’s Introduction to the Novel, a large lecture course. She said the tutorial “revolutionized my relationship to literature.” “That sounds silly, but I do mean it,” she said. “I reevaluated my responsibilities as a reader, and took profound delight in going to class.” Emerson said her favorite text was Blake’s “The Marriage of Heaven and Hell,” for which it was her turn to write a paper. “I was entirely unaware of how exceptionally bizarre Blake, and in particular this poem — if it even is a poem — are,” she said.
Emerson said Murphy let the student chose what they wanted to discuss in their papers and the rebuttal, “and from there the two of us would discuss what we found interesting and exciting, or what we disagreed upon.” As the conversation continued, the professor would interject, usually with pointed questions that Emerson said “unfailingly clarified — and when appropriate complicated — our arguments and opinions.” Murphy said he deliberately kept his distance in the early stages of each class to let the students find their own way. “You try not to talk,” he said, which got the message home to the students very quickly about where the onus of the course would be. “They couldn’t come in not ready to go.”
“For any student, that is a quite a powerful feeling.” And the feeling was, in its way, mutual. “It’s been inspiring,” Murphy said. The reading list includes:
Header image: “Man and Woman Contemplating the Moon” by Caspar David Friedrich
|