|
1
|
- Stephen Sheppard
- Williams College
- Presentations and papers available at
http://www.williams.edu/Economics/UrbanGrowth/HomePage.htm
|
|
2
|
- Urban expansion taking place world wide
- Rich
- Evolving from transportation choices - “car culture”
- Failure of planning system?
- Poor
- Rural to urban migration
- Urban bias?
- Policy challenges
- Environmental impact from transportation
- Preservation of open space
- Pressure for housing and infrastructure provision
- Policy response
- Land use planning
- Public transport subsidies & private transport taxes
- Rural development
- Surprisingly few global studies of this global phenomenon
- Limited data availability
|
|
3
|
- To address the lack of data, we construct a sample of urban areas
- The sample is representative of the global urban population in cities
with population over 100,000
- Random sub-sample of UN Habitat sample
- Stratified by region, city size and income level
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
- Households:
- L households
- Income y
- Preferences v(c,q)
- composite good c
- housing q.
- Household located at x pays annual transportation costs
- In equilibrium, household optimization implies:
- for all locations x
- Housing q for consumption is produced by a housing production sector
|
|
15
|
- Housing producers
- Production function H(N, l) to produce square meters of housing
- N = capital input, l=land input
- Constant returns to scale and free entry determines an equilibrium land
rent function r(x) and a capital-land ratio (building density) S(x)
- Land value and building density decline with distance
- Combining the S(x) with housing demand q(x) provides a solution for the
population density D(x,t,y,u) as a function of distance t and utility
level u
- The extent of urban land use is determined by the condition:
|
|
16
|
- Equilibrium requires:
- The model provides a solution for the extent of urban land use as a
function of
- Generalize the model to include an export sector and obtain comparative
statics with respect to:
- MP of land in goods production
- World price of the export good
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
- We consider three classes of empirical models
- Linear models of urban land cover
- Linear models of the change in urban land cover
- Log-linear models of urban land cover
- Each approach has different relative merits
- Linear models – simplicity and sample size
- Change in urban land use – endogeneity
- Log linear – interaction and capture of non-linear impact
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
- Policies designed to limit urban expansion tend to focus on a few
variables
- Transportation costs and modal choice
- Combat “car culture”
- Provide mass transit alternatives
- Limit road building
- Rural to urban migration and population growth
- Enhance economic opportunity in rural areas
- Residence permits for cities
- Considerable urban expansion occurs naturally as a result of economic
growth
- Limiting migration could be effective but ...
- Economic misallocation costs
- Problems where free mobility considered an important right
- Importance of the commercial (non-residential) sector
- Direct impact on land use
- Indirect via income generation and employment decentralization
|
|
27
|
- What are the implications for non-residential land use?
- Industrial
- Export good production
- Often at urban periphery
- Office and trade
- Central and peripheral location
- These uses compete with residential use
- Factors that tend to increase urban expansion
- Promote infill development at central locations
- Increase non-residential property prices
- What data are available for analysis?
|
|
28
|
- CBRE Global Office Rent Data
- Data start in 1998
- 39 of our cities
|
|
29
|
|
|
30
|
- At the national level
- Strong relation between lighted area and GDP
- At the local level
- Explore potential for disaggregating output to subareas
- Test this process in US and European cities where employment and output
measures are available for subareas
|
|
31
|
- We have light intensity data for three time periods – approximately
covering the time period of our land cover measurements
|
|
32
|
- In rapidly changing urban settings, the night light data provide
potential for measuring changing land use
|
|
33
|
- Limited use for direct identification of urban land use
- Limited resolving power of data
- Light diffusion
- Greater potential as localized index income and employment
- Use observed illumination to disaggregate national/regional income to
local areas
- Potential when used together with urban land cover measurements
- Non-residential uses are associated with brighter levels of illumination
- As a localized index of commercial land use, consider:
|
|
34
|
- Many issues to address going forward
- Endogeneity issues
- Transport costs
- Income
- Links to global economy
- Effectiveness of planning policies
- Availability of housing finance
- In progress
- Field research to collect data
- Evaluation of classification accuracy
- Modeling at micro-scale –
- transition from non-urban to urban state
- Interaction with other local development
|
|
35
|
- Maintained hypothesis: that non-residential urban land use is more
intensively lit than residential (or detected as such)
- Increased linkage to global economy increases industrial land use
- Increased industrial land use increases employment suburbanization
- Increased sensitivity of urban expansion to income
- Decreased sensitivity of urban expansion to transport (fuel) costs
- Factors promoting urban expansion will increase commercial property
rents
- Explore potential for identification of separate impacts of income and
automobile transport
|