Forensic Confirmation Bias |
Publications |
|
Kukucka, Hiley, & Kassin (2020). Forensic confirmation bias: Do jurors discount examiners who were exposed to task-irrelevant information? Journal of the Forensic Sciences, 65, 1978-1990. |
|
Dror, Kukucka, Kassin, Zapf (2018). No one is immune to contextual bias—Not even forensic pathologists. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. |
|
Dror, Kukucka, Kassin, & Zapf (2018). When expert decision making goes wrong: Consensus, bias, the role of experts, and accuracy. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. |
|
Zapf, Kukucka, Kassin, & Dror (2018). Cognitive bias in forensic mental health assessment: Evaluator beliefs about its nature and scope. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law.
|
|
Kukucka, Kassin, Zapf, & Dror (2017). Cognitive bias and blindness: A global survey of forensic science examiners. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition.
|
|
Marion, Kukucka, Collins, Kassin, & Burke (2016). Lost proof of innocence: The impact of confessions on alibi witnesses. Law and Human Behavior. |
|
Kukucka & Kassin (2014). Do confessions taint perceptions of handwriting evidence? An empirical test of the forensic confirmation bias. Law and Human Behavior.
|
|
Kassin, Dror, & Kukucka (2013). The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions. Journal of Applied Research in Memory & Cognition.
|
|
Dror, Kassin, & Kukucka (2013). New application of psychology to law: Improving forensic evidence and expert witness contributions. Journal of Applied Research in Memory & Cognition.
|
|
Kassin, Bogart, & Kerner (2012). Confessions that corrupt: Evidence from the DNA exoneration case files. Psychological Science. |
|
Hasel & Kassin (2009). On the presumption of evidentiary independence: Can confessions corrupt eyewitness identifications? Psychological Science. |
|
Kassin, Goldstein, & Savitsky (2003). Behavioral confirmation in the interrogation room: On the dangers of presuming guilt. Law and Human Behavior. |
Links |
|
National Commission on Forensic Science. (2015). Ensuring that forensic analysis is based upon task-relevant information.
|
|
National Academy of Sciences (2009). Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward (Executive Summary).
|