| Eyewitness
Testimony |
| Eyewitness
Experts |
|
There are many competent eyewitness
experts in
North America, all with Ph.D.s in
psychology, research publications,
and courtroom
experience -- all of whom I highly
recommend. |
| How
Eyewitness Data Should be Collected |
|
|
Wixted & Wells (2017): The Relationship Between Eyewitness Confidence and Identification Accuracy: A New Synthesis |
|
|
National Academy of Sciences (2014): Identifying the Culprit: Assessing Eyewitness Identification |
|
On August 24, 2011, the New Jersey Supreme Court issued a landmark decision on eyewitness identification, citing recent research in the area. |
|
The Justice Project (2007). Eyewitness identification: A policy review. |
|
In 1998, a Committee of the American
Psychology-Law Society published a
white paper that reviews the scientific
evidence on eyewitness identification
and proposed rules for how lineups
and photo spreads should be conducted. This
article was published in Law and
Human Behavior. |
|
In 1999, the U.S. National
Institute
of Justice developed
research-based guidelines
on how to collect eyewitness
identifications in ways
that minimize error.
The recommendations were
published in Eyewitness
Evidence:
A Guide for Law Enforcement.
|
| What
the Experts
Think |
|
Kassin, Tubb,
Hosch, & Memon (2001). On
the "general acceptance" of eyewitness
testimony research: A new survey
of the experts. American Psychologist. |
|
Kassin, Ellsworth, & Smith
(1989). The "general acceptance" of
psychological research on eyewitness
testimony: A Survey of the experts. American
Psychologist. |
| Links |
|
PBS Frontline's What Jennifer
Saw |
|
Prof. Gary
Wells (Iowa State University) |
|
James
Doyle’s True Witness (2005,
Palgrave MacMillan) |
| top |
|
